Water equivalent thickness of immobilization devices in proton therapy planning - Modelling at treatment planning and validation by measurements wi...

Phys Med. 2017 Mar;35:31-38. Epub 2017 Feb 23.

Fellin F1Righetto R1Fava G1Trevisan D2Amelio D1Farace P3.

1   Proton Therapy Unit, Hospital of Trento, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy.

2   Medical Physics Department, Hospital of Trento, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy.

3   Proton Therapy Unit, Hospital of Trento, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy. Electronic address: paolofarace@gmail.com.

 

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To investigate the range errors made in treatment planning due to the presence of the immobilization devices along the proton beam path.

METHODS:

The measured water equivalent thickness (WET) of selected devices was measured by a high-energy spot and a multi-layer ionization chamber and compared with that predicted by treatment planning system (TPS). Two treatment couches, two thermoplastic masks (both un-stretched and stretched) and one headrest were selected. At TPS, every immobilization device was modelled as being part of the patient. The following parameters were assessed: CT acquisition protocol, dose-calculation grid-sizes (1.5 and 3.0mm) and beam-entrance with respect to the devices (coplanar and non-coplanar). Finally, the potential errors produced by a wrong manual separation between treatment couch and the CT table (not present during treatment) were investigated.

RESULTS:

In the thermoplastic mask, there was a clear effect due to beam entrance, a moderate effect due to the CT protocols and almost no effect due to TPS grid-size, with 1mm errors observed only when thick un-stretched portions were crossed by non-coplanar beams. In the treatment couches the WET errors were negligible (<0.3mm) regardless of the grid-size and CT protocol. The potential range errors produced in the manual separation between treatment couch and CT table were small with 1.5mm grid-size, but could be >0.5mm with a 3.0mm grid-size. In the headrest, WET errors were negligible (0.2mm).

CONCLUSIONS:

With only one exception (un-stretched mask, non-coplanar beams), the WET of all the immobilization devices was properly modelled by the TPS.

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
Name
Surname
Your email address
Telephone
Your request
Provincia autonoma di Trento, in conformità con l'art. 13 della Legge 196/2003 e successive modifiche, dichiara che i dati personali qui raccolti hanno finalità di registrare l'utente, attivare nei suoi confronti il servizio richiesto e fornirgli informazioni sull'attività ed i servizi del Centro di Protonterapia, nonché sulle iniziative e le attività promosse dallo stesso. Tali dati verranno trattati elettronicamente in conformità con le leggi vigenti; si garantisce la riservatezza degli stessi e che non saranno oggetto di comunicazione o diffusione a terzi. L'interessato può esercitare in qualsiasi momento i diritti di cui all'art. 7 della suddetta legge (accesso correzione e cancellazione dei dati), rivolgendosi a Provincia autonoma di Trento, uff.informazioni@provincia.tn.it.
PROTON THERAPY CENTRE - TRENTO
ADDRESS:
Via Al Desert n.14, 38123 Trento

MAIL:
protonterapia@apss.tn.it

TELEPHONE:
+39 0461 1953100

HOURS: Lun - Ven | 8.30 - 16.00